Fenech & Fenech Advocates contributes to the Mondaq Comparative Guide, Labour & Employment – Malta
Paul Gonzi, Partner at Fenech & Fenech Advocates, was invited to contribute the Malta chapter in the Comparative Guide on Labour & Employment published by Mondaq. The publication is presented in a Q&A format, providing a practical comparative overview of some of the key points of law, practice and regulatory environments across multiple jurisdictions. This contribution attests to Fenech & Fenech’s leading position in the field of employment law in both the private and public sectors, and in associates subjects of data protection, equality and health and safety. The firm boasts a team of lawyers and experienced litigators specialised in the field.
The publication can be accessed here and more information may be obtained by contacting Dr Paul Gonzi.
OUTLINE
Related Insights
Malta Implements New Minimum Working Time Regulations applicable to the Inland Waterway Transport sector
View
“The Union’s Revival”: New Regulations set to bolster union bargaining in Malta
View
“Women on Boards Regulations” – Narrowing the Gender Gap in Listed Companies
View
Law Booth – Episode 8 – Paul Gonzi explores the new Work-Life Balance Rules with the Director General of the Department of Industrial and Employment Relations
View
Employment 2021: A Chambers Global Practice Guide Publication – Fenech & Fenech Advocates on Malta
View
TerraLex – Cross-Border Guide to Vaccine Mandates – Fenech & Fenech Advocates on Malta
View
Employment & Labour Law Country Comparative Guide 2021 – Fenech & Fenech Advocates on Malta
View
‘Reasonable Accommodation’ of Persons with a Disability – An Employer’s perspective
View
Prevention is better than cure – Malta introduces face mask requirement at all times and in all places
View
Special paid leave for mandatory quarantine in Malta in view of COVID-19 pandemic
View
Employment Law Update – Employers to keep record of the hours worked by Employees
View
The binding & retroactive application of “A1 Certificates” CJEU Case C-527/16 – Alpenrind & others
View